Haskins v. New Jerusalem Church of God in Christ et al

Filing 17

ORDER re Plaintiff's #4 Motion to Remand. The Court STRIKES the Amended Complaint at Dkt. #6 . See McGrath v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 298 F.R.D. 601, 607 (S.D. Cal. 2014) (adopting approach of "cases applying 28 U.S.C. 1447(e) to scrutinize the propriety of diversity destroying amendment"). Plaintiff Haskins may timely move to amend the complaint. The Court DENIES the motion to remand without prejudice. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 ALETA HASKINS, an individual, and NEW JERUSALEM CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST, a Washington corporation, 11 14 v. GUIDEONE INSURANCE, a corporation, Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiffs, 12 13 NO. 2:24-cv-01709-JHC Before the Court is Plaintiff Haskins’s Motion to Remand. Dkt. # 4. The Court has considered all materials filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the rest of the case file, and the governing law. Being fully advised, the Court rules as follows: The Court STRIKES the Amended Complaint at Dkt. # 6. See McGrath v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 298 F.R.D. 601, 607 (S.D. Cal. 2014) (adopting approach of “cases applying 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) to scrutinize the propriety of diversity destroying amendment”). Plaintiff Haskins may timely move to amend the complaint. The Court DENIES the motion to remand without prejudice. / / ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND - 1 1 DATED this 22nd day of November, 2024. 2 3 4 JOHN H. CHUN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?