DataPro International Inc v. Biamp Systems LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting Defendant's 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Biamp Systems, LLC has up to and including 1/17/2025 in which to file their answer. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SB)

Download PDF
1 The Hon. Robert S. Lasnik 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 DATAPRO INTERNATIONAL INC., 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. Case No. 2:24-cv-01807-RSL ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME BIAMP SYSTEMS, LLC and CREATION NETWORKS, INC., Defendants. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on Biamp Systems, LLC’s Unopposed Motion for an 17 Extension of Time to file its answer. The Court being fully apprised in the premises, it is hereby: 18 ORDERED that Biamp Systems, LLC’s Motion is hereby GRANTED; Biamp Systems, 19 LLC has up to and including January 17, 2025 in which to file their answer. 20 21 Dated this 3rd day of January, 2025. 22 23 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 Presented by: s/ Dallas DeLuca MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 Case No. 2:24-cv-01807-RSL MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC 1455 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1900 PORTLAND, OR 97201 (503) 295-3085 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dallas DeLuca, WSBA #45948 DallasDeLuca@MarkowitzHerbold.com 1455 SW Broadway, Suite 1900 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: (503) 295-3085 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Terence P. Ross (pro hac vice forthcoming) terence.ross@katten.com Sean Wooden (pro hac vice forthcoming) sean.wooden@katten.com 1919 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20006 Phone: (202) 625-3500 Attorneys for Defendant Biamp Systems, LLC 2246837.1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2 Case No. 2:24-cv-01807-RSL MARKOWITZ HERBOLD PC 1455 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1900 PORTLAND, OR 97201 (503) 295-3085

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?