Maneman et al v. Weyerhaeuser Company et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting Parties' 41 Stipulated Motion on Briefing Schedule. Plaintiffs shall file a combined opposition to the pending motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 32 , 33 ) by 5/2/2025. Defendants may file separate replies per Local Rule 7(e)(3) by 5/30/2025. The Clerk shall re-note the pending motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 32 , 33 ) to 5/30/2025. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (KRA)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 GREGORY MANEMAN et al., v. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C24-2050-KKE ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE WEYERHAUSER COMPANY et al., Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulated motion regarding consolidated opposition and extensions. Dkt. No. 41. The Court finds good cause to combine the responsive briefing to the two pending motions to dismiss and to extend the briefing schedule. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiffs shall file a combined opposition to the pending motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 32, 33) by May 2, 2025. The combined opposition shall not exceed 16,800 words. 2. Defendants may file separate replies per Local Rule 7(e)(3) by May 30, 2025. The Clerk shall re-note the pending motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 32, 33) to May 30, 2025. Dated this 12th day of March, 2025. A Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?