Hernandez v. Vancouver City of et al

Filing 97

ORDER granting 90 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 94 Motion to Expand Discovery by Judge Franklin D. Burgess.(SPH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The materials submitted by Plaintiff in his motion to expand the record were considered in the Court's determination of the Defendant's motion to compel. Accordingly, the motion to expand the record is moot. v. CITY OF VANCOUVER and MARK TANNINEN, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ROLANDO HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C04-5539 FDB ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL This matter came before the Court on Defendants' motion to compel. The Court has considered the arguments presented by both parties and considers itself fully advised. 1 Defendants' motion to compel is hereby GRANTED for the reasons stated in said motion. Plaintiff is ordered to fully respond to Defendant's Third Set of Requests for Production within ten (10) days of this Order. The Court further finds that any attorney-client or work product privilege between Plaintiff and Gregory D. Ferguson is waived. Plaintiff shall produce all documents referenced on the privilege log (Decl. of E. Harnden, Ex. C) without redaction within ten (10) days of this order. 00138574.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants' request for fees and costs is denied. Plaintiff and/or his attorney are cautioned that further unwarranted obstruction of discovery will result in the imposition of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 5th day of January, 2009. A FRANKLIN D. BURGESS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?