IN RE: Richard Roy Scott

Filing 153

ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall open a new civil case, Richard Roy Scott v Mark Strong, and shall file in that docket both the original complaint (Dkt. No. 142-1) and the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 150) which Mr. Scott filed upon receipt of the Ninth Circuit's Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Scott's request to be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the above mention matter is GRANTED 142 . Signed by Chief Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(CMG)(cc to Plaintiff) Modified on 1/13/2016 (CMG).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 CASE NO. MC05-5029 MJP In re: RICHARD ROY SCOTT 11 ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT MANDATE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 On December 22, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mandate in Case No. 14-35501, effectuating an order from earlier in the year reversing this Court’s decision to deny Mr. Scott IFP status in regards to a complaint he had filed. (See Dkt. No. 142-1, Richard Roy Scott v. Mark Strong.) In light of that order, the Court rules as follows: IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall open a new civil case, Richard Roy Scott v. Mark Strong, and shall file in that docket both the original complaint (Dkt. No. 142-1) and the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 150) which Mr. Scott filed upon receipt of the Ninth Circuit’s order. 24 ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT MANDATE- 1 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Scott’s request to be permitted to proceed in forma 2 pauperis in the above-mentioned matter is GRANTED. 3 4 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 5 Dated this 12th day of January, 2016. 6 8 A 9 Marsha J. Pechman United States Chief District Judge 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT MANDATE- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?