Ingram et al v. Raymond

Filing 2

ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Plaintiff's Application for Court Appointed Counsel 1 are DENIED by Judge Franklin D. Burgess.(CAR, )

Download PDF
Ingram et al v. Raymond Doc. 2 Case 3:06-cv-05122-FDB Document 2 Filed 03/10/2006 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 1 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA MICHAEL L. INGRAM and SANDRA L. KLOTZ, Plaintiffs, Case No. C06-5122FDB ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DENYING APPLICATION FOR COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL JOHN RAYMOND, CRADDOCK VERSER, MARK HUTH, KAREN KATES HILDT, RICHARD SHANEYFELT, JULIE DALZELL, RICHARD L. DAVIES, BRIAN POST, DEBRA KRONK, GORDON TAMURA, KELLI KING, SCOTTY BOYD, RICK SMITH, BENJAMIN STAMPER, STEVE RICHMOND, and JEFFERSON MENTAL HEALTH, Defendants. Plaintiffs have filed a pro se civil rights action against the above-named Jefferson County Defendants (judges, prosecutors, public defender, sheriff's department personnel), and have applied for court-appointed counsel and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Having reviewed Plaintiffs' Financial Affidavit and application to proceed in forma pauperis, as well as Plaintiffs' Complaint, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs' have sufficient income to pay the filing fee in this matter and courtappointed counsel will be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Plaintiffs' Application For Court-Appointed Counsel are DENIED. DATED this 10th day of March, 2006. A FRANKLIN D. BURGESS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?