Witt v. Department of the Air Force et al

Filing 122

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Remaining Pretrial and Trial Dates by parties. (Phipps, Peter)

Download PDF
Witt v. Department of the Air Force et al Doc. 122 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Judge Ronald B. Leighton UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA MAJOR MARGARET WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C06-5195 RBL STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. STIPULATION The above-captioned case has proceeded through discovery, which has closed, and initial summary judgment briefs have been filed. Both parties have requested oral argument for their cross motions for summary judgment. In the event that neither party is successful in summary judgment, trial is set for September 13, 2010, and working backwards from that date, a pre-trial conference is currently scheduled for September 2, 2010, a pretrial order is due August 27, 2010, and motions in limine are due August 16, 2010. Having reviewed the pretrial schedule as well as the remaining summary judgment motion deadlines (along with plaintiff's motion regarding spoliation of evidence), the parties have determined and agreed that an extension of the approaching deadlines would be beneficial. Currently, deadlines for the completion of summary judgment briefing overlap with the ( C 0 6 -5 1 9 5 -R B L ) STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES- 1 U N I T E D STATES D E P A R T M E N T O F JU S T I C E C I V I L D I V I S I O N , FED E R A L PR O G R A M S BR A N C H P . O . BOX 883, BEN FRANKLIN STATION W A S H IN G T O N , D . C . 20044 ( 2 0 2 ) 616-8482 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 spoliation briefing deadlines as well as pretrial briefing deadlines. Depending on the resolution of summary judgment, if trial is necessary, an extension of the pretrial deadlines would allow for the possibility of a trial with a narrower scope (depending on the resolution of issues at summary judgment). In addition, plaintiff has very recently learned that two of her intended trial witnesses will be traveling abroad in the near future. To preserve the testimony of those individuals, plaintiff has indicated her intention to depose those witnesses in the upcoming weeks (before they travel abroad). Defendants do not object to those preservation depositions, and an extension of the pretrial deadlines would allow the parties to prepare for, travel to, and depose those witnesses. Also, if trial is necessary, the schedule proposed by the parties allows the parties the opportunity to minimize the time necessary for trial by providing additional time for the parties to confer, and potentially stipulate to certain exhibits. Accordingly, the parties to this action, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree to the following schedule: For Plaintiff's Pending Spoliation Motion Defendants' Opposition would be due by August 5, 2010. Plaintiff's Reply would be due by August 13, 2010. For The Pending Summary Judgment Briefing The noting date would be moved to August 27, 2010; and memoranda in opposition would be due August 20, 2010, with replies due August 27, 2010. For the Trial Schedule The trial date would be moved to November 1 (from September 13). Other pre-trial dates would be moved as well. The motions in limine date would be October 4; the pretrial order and/or witness and exhibit lists would be due on October 15; proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law would be due on October 19; and the final pretrial conference would be October 21. If trial takes place, the parties will likely call witnesses who need to travel from far away to attend trial (as will undersigned defense counsel). For that reason, the parties request a ( C 0 6 -5 1 9 5 -R B L ) STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES- 2 U N I T E D STATES D E P A R T M E N T O F JU S T I C E C I V I L D I V I S I O N , FED E R A L PR O G R A M S BR A N C H P . O . BOX 883, BEN FRANKLIN STATION W A S H IN G T O N , D . C . 20044 ( 2 0 2 ) 616-8482 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 separate telephonic conference to schedule trial dates that the Court is available and that would also accommodate the witnesses and counsel. The parties would request such a separate conference take place sometime before September 15, 2010. Dated: July 29, 2010 /s/ Sarah A. Dunne Sarah A. Dunne Sher Kung American Civil Liberties Union of Washington 705 Second Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: (206) 624-2184 E-mail: dunne@aclu-wa.org James E. Lobsenz Carney Badley Spellman, P.S. 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: (206) 622-8020 Fax: (206) 622-8983 E-mail: lobsenz@carneylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Respectfully submitted, TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General VINCENT M. GARVEY Deputy Branch Director /s/ Peter J. Phipps PETER J. PHIPPS BRYAN R. DIEDERICH STEPHEN J. BUCKINGHAM United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch Tel: (202) 616-8482 Fax: (202) 616-8470 E-mail: peter.phipps@usdoj.gov Mailing Address: Post Office Box 883, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Courier Address: 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Attorneys for Defendants II. ORDER Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause shown, THE FOLLOWING ARE HEREBY ORDERED. Regarding Plaintiff's Spoliation Motion: Defendants' Opposition is Due August 5, 2010, and Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum is due August 13, 2010. Regarding Summary Judgment Briefing: The noting date is now August 27, 2010, and memoranda in opposition are due ( C 0 6 -5 1 9 5 -R B L ) STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES- 3 U N I T E D STATES D E P A R T M E N T O F JU S T I C E C I V I L D I V I S I O N , FED E R A L PR O G R A M S BR A N C H P . O . BOX 883, BEN FRANKLIN STATION W A S H IN G T O N , D . C . 20044 ( 2 0 2 ) 616-8482 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 August 20, 2010, and replies due August 27, 2010. Regarding the Trial Schedule: The trial date is November 1, 2010; Motions in limine are due October 4, 2010; The pretrial order and/or witness and exhibit lists are due October 15, 2010; Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law are due October 19, 2010; and The final pretrial conference would be October 21, 2010. The Court will also set a telephonic conference to set trial dates more definitively that will take place prior to September 15, 2010. Date: ______________________ ________________________________ RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presented by TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General VINCENT M. GARVEY Deputy Branch Director /s/ Peter J. Phipps PETER J. PHIPPS BRYAN R. DIEDERICH STEPHEN J. BUCKINGHAM United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch Tel: (202) 616-8482 Fax: (202) 616-8470 E-mail: peter.phipps@usdoj.gov Mailing Address: Post Office Box 883, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Courier Address: 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Attorneys for Defendants Dated: July 29, 2010 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Sarah A. Dunne Sarah A. Dunne Sher Kung American Civil Liberties Union of Washington 705 Second Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: (206) 624-2184 E-mail: dunne@aclu-wa.org James E. Lobsenz Carney Badley Spellman, P.S. 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: (206) 622-8020 Fax: (206) 622-8983 E-mail: lobsenz@carneylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 25 26 27 28 ( C 0 6 -5 1 9 5 -R B L ) STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES- 4 U N I T E D STATES D E P A R T M E N T O F JU S T I C E C I V I L D I V I S I O N , FED E R A L PR O G R A M S BR A N C H P . O . BOX 883, BEN FRANKLIN STATION W A S H IN G T O N , D . C . 20044 ( 2 0 2 ) 616-8482

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?