Combs v. Lehman, et al.

Filing 148

ORDER granting 146 Motion for Extension of Time to file response to the 142 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Thereof. The 142 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Thereof is RE-NOTED to 7/30/10. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. JOSEPH D. LEHMAN, et al. Defendants. On March 18, 2010, Defendants filed a motion to amend their Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. 141) and a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 142). The motion for summary judgment is noted for consideration on April 16, 2010. Dkt. 142. Plaintiff filed a Motion and Declaration for an Enlargement of Time, requesting an additional ninety days to respond to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 143. The court granted the motion and established a response date of May 31, 2010. Dkt. 144. Plaintiff now seeks another sixty day extension. Dkt. 146. Defendants do not object to an extension because counsel will be out of the office for two weeks beginning May 27, 2010, however, they request that a shorter extension than that requested by Plaintiff be granted. Dkt. 147. It is ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's motion for an extension (Dkt. 146) is GRANTED; Plaintiff shall UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ROBIN BLAKE COMBS, SR., Plaintiff, NO. C08-5063 RJB/KLS ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT file his response on or before July 26, 2010. ORDER - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (2) The Clerk shall re-note Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 142) for July 30, 2010, and send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. DATED this 10th day of June, 2010. A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?