Curtis v. Benda, et al.

Filing 185

ORDER denying 184 Motion for Reconsideration of the order denying the motion to amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

4
5

JAMES EDWARD CURTIS,
6
Plaintiff,
7

NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

v.
8
9

TERRY J. BENDA and WILLIAM E.
RILEY,

10

Defendants.

11

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. ECF No. 184. Plaintiff

12
seeks reconsideration of this Court’s Order denying his second motion to amend. ECF No.
13
14

182. Under Local Rule CR7(h), motions for reconsideration are disfavored and will be denied

15

absent a showing of manifest error or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could

16

not have been presented earlier with reasonable diligence. That standard has not been met in

17

this case.

18
19

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
(1)

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 184) is DENIED.

(2)

The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant.

20
21
22
23
24
25

DATED this 7th day of July, 2011.

A

Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge

26

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

1