Curtis v. Benda, et al.
Filing
198
ORDER granting 193 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff's response is due on or before 10/31/11; Defendant's response is due on or before 11/4/11; and the 191 MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity and Memorandum in Support Thereof is RENOTED to: 11/4/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
JAMES EDWARD CURTIS,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
11
TERRY J. BENDA and WILLIAM E.
RILEY,
12
NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants.
13
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendant
14
Riley’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 193. Plaintiff has recently obtained counsel
15
16
and counsel will require additional time to review the files and adequately respond to the
17
motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 193. Defendant Riley is not opposed to an
18
extension of sixty days. ECF No. 195.
19
20
21
Counsel is directed to correct his pleadings to show that Judge Benjamin H. Settle is
the presiding District Judge in this case.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
22
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion for extension (ECF No. 193) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall
23
24
file his response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on or before October 31,
25
2011. Defendant may file a reply on or before November 4, 2011. The Clerk is directed to
26
re-note Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 191) for November 4, 2011.
ORDER
1
2
(2)
The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for
Defendants.
3
4
DATED this 2nd day of September, 2011.
A
5
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?