Curtis v. Benda, et al.

Filing 198

ORDER granting 193 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff's response is due on or before 10/31/11; Defendant's response is due on or before 11/4/11; and the 191 MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity and Memorandum in Support Thereof is RENOTED to: 11/4/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 JAMES EDWARD CURTIS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 TERRY J. BENDA and WILLIAM E. RILEY, 12 NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendant 14 Riley’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 193. Plaintiff has recently obtained counsel 15 16 and counsel will require additional time to review the files and adequately respond to the 17 motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 193. Defendant Riley is not opposed to an 18 extension of sixty days. ECF No. 195. 19 20 21 Counsel is directed to correct his pleadings to show that Judge Benjamin H. Settle is the presiding District Judge in this case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 22 (1) Plaintiff’s motion for extension (ECF No. 193) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall 23 24 file his response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on or before October 31, 25 2011. Defendant may file a reply on or before November 4, 2011. The Clerk is directed to 26 re-note Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 191) for November 4, 2011. ORDER 1 2 (2) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. 3 4 DATED this 2nd day of September, 2011. A 5 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?