Curtis v. Benda, et al.

Filing 202

ORDER granting 199 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendant's 191 MOTION for Summary Judgment on or before 2/6/12. Defendant may file a reply on or before 2/10/12. The Clerk is directed to RENOTE Defendant's 191 MOTION for Summary Judgment for 2/10/2012. The parties shall file their joint status report on 4/13/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 JAMES EDWARD CURTIS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME 10 11 TERRY J. BENDA and WILLIAM E. RILEY, 12 Defendants. 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for extensions of time to respond to Defendant 14 Riley’s motion for summary judgment and for the filing of the parties’ Joint Status Report. 15 16 ECF No. 199. Defendant Riley is in agreement with the requested extensions. Id. 17 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 18 (1) Plaintiff’s motion for extension (ECF No. 199) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall 19 file his response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on or before February 6, 20 2012.1 Defendant may file a reply on or before February 10, 2012. The Clerk is directed to 21 re-note Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 191) for February 10, 2012. 22 The parties shall file their joint status report on April 13, 2012. 23 24 1 25 26 Plaintiff requested that the summary judgment motion be re-noted for February 3, 2012 and that the time for his response extended to February 3, 2012. The proposed dates, however, do not allow for the filing of a reply by Defendant to Plaintiff’s response. ORDER 1 2 (2) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. 3 4 DATED this 4th day of November, 2011. A 5 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?