United States of America v. Palmer et al
Filing
61
ORDER denying 56 Defendants' Motion for Default by Judge Franklin D. Burgess.(SPH)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 1 This matter comes before the Court on motion of Defendants for entry of default against the United States on the counterclaim of the Defendants Timothy and Deanna Palmer. The Court, having reviewed the motion, Defendants' pleadings and the record herein, is fully informed and denies the motion for default. On January 22, 2009, this Court entered an Order dismissing with prejudice, the Palmers' counterclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [Dkt. #55]. Consequentially, Defendants' motion for default is subject to dismissal as moot and without merit ACCORDINGLY;. IT IS ORDERED: The Defendants' request for default [Dkt. #56] is DENIED. DATED this 29th day of January, 2009 v. TIMOTHY L. PALMER, DEANNA M. PALMER, THE LAND BOUNTIFUL ONE, PIERCE COUNTY , Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil No. C08-5249 FDB ORDER DENYING COUNTERCLAIMANTS' REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST UNITED STATES
A
FRANKLIN D. BURGESS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
