Advocare International LP v. Scheckenbach et al

Filing 338

ORDER granting 311 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Dismissing With Prejudice Defendants' Counterclaim. Request for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. RICHARD PAUL SCHECKENBACH, et al., Defendants. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, Plaintiff, HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Case No. C08-5332 RBL ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Dkt. #311] THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Dkt. #311]. Plaintiff AdvoCare seeks summary judgment dismissal of Defendants Tai Brown, Kelli Bottolfson Brown, and HerbAsia's "frivolous lawsuit" counterclaim. In April, 2009, the court denied Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this claim under Rule 12 (b)(6) [Dkt. # 103]. As the Plaintiff correctly points out, the parties have litigated the merits of the various claims and defenses significantly since that time. While the parties devote the bulk of their submittals discussing the law of the case doctrine, the Plaintiff's contention that the litigation which has occurred since that time alone demonstrates that Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants are not frivolous, whether or not they ultimately prevail. On the record now before this Court, the Defendants' "frivolous lawsuit" counterclaim is legally insufficient as a matter of law. The Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the Defendants' Counterclaim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The request for sanctions is DENIED. ORDER Page - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 30th day of August, 2010. A RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER Page - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?