Ayers v. Richard et al

Filing 101

ORDER re 69 Defendant Griffith's MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Randall Griffith by Judge Karen L Strombom. (JLP)(Copy mailed to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Page - 1 (2) Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Randall Griffith's motion for summary judgment. Dkt. # 69. In that motion, Mr. Griffith refers to Exhibits A through F, but those exhibits were not filed with the Court. Id. In addition, counsel filed an Affidavit in support of Mr. Griffith's summary judgment motion, but it is not signed by Mr. Griffith. Dkt. # 70. The Court is unable to determine the merits of Defendant Griffiths motion based on the record now before it. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) Defendant Randall Griffith shall re-file his motion for summary judgment, with appropriate exhibits and signed affidavit, and re-note his motion so that Plaintiff Ayers may have an opportunity to file a response. Defendant Randall Griffith's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #69) and present noting date shall be stricken from the Court's calendar. v. HENRY RICHARDS, et al., Defendants. LENIER RENE AYERS, Plaintiff, Case No. C08-5390 BHS/KLS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT GRIFFITH'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STRIKING NOTING DATE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. DATED this 12th day of March, 2009. A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge ORDER Page - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?