Ayers v. Richard et al

Filing 110

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S "URGENT MATTER FOR THE COURT'S CONSIDERATION " re 107 , signed by Judge Karen L Strombom. (PL)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 1 Before the Court is Plaintiff=s AUrgent Matter for the Court=s Consideration.@ Dkt. 107. This document was not filed in the form of a motion or noted for hearing according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, Mr. Ayers asks this Court for an order directing the Special Commitment Center (SCC) to allow him to exceed his monthly allotment for photocopies. Dkt. 107, p. 2, 3. Mr. Ayers= previous requests that this Court intervene on his behalf with the SCC (Dkts.55 and 67) have been denied. Dkt. 79. His motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 84) was also denied. Dkt. 87. Plaintiff complains that he requires the Court=s interference so that he may file motions to compel and submit copies of discovery response documents before the discovery deadline of June v. HENRY RICHARDS, et al, Defendants. LENIER AYERS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case No. C08-5390 BHS/KLS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF=S AURGENT MATTER FOR THE COURT=S CONSIDERATION@

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

5, 2009. See Dkt. 65. If Mr. Ayers requires a continuance of the discovery deadline so that he may complete his discovery, he may request a continuance and should do so in the form of a motion, properly filed, served on defense counsel, and noted for hearing in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff should set forth his reasons for the continuance and the length of the continuance he is requesting in that motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff=s request that the Court contact the SCC (Dkt. 107) is DENIED. DATED this 28th day of May, 2009.

A

Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER - 2