Quinstreet Inc v. Ferguson

Filing 122

MINUTE ORDER by the Court: that the 98 Motion to Compel is STRICKEN. Upon review of the file ORAL ARGUMENT still appears appropriate on the remaining motions and SHALL BE SET FOR 8/5/09 at 9:30 a.m. The defendant's 89 MOTION to Compel Di scovery for Request for Production, set two; 90 MOTION to Compel Discovery for Interrogatories and Request for Production, Set Three and Request for Production, set four , and 105 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order are RENOTED for 8/5/09. (CMG)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. MARK FERGUSON d/b/a/ WHEW.COM, an individual, Defendant. The following Minute Order is made by the Court, United States District Judge Robert J. Bryan: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA QUINSTREET, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,

Case No. C08-5525RJB MINUTE ORDER

On June 11, 2009, Defendant, acting pro se, filed a Motion to Compel Discovery for Requests for Production, Set Two (Dkt. 89) and a Motion to Compel Discovery for Interrogatories and Request for Production, Set Three and Request for Production, Set Four (Dkt. 90). Both motions were noted for consideration on June 26, 2009. Id. On June 22, 2009, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Protective Order seeking an order "limiting the requests for admissions that were timely served to a reasonable amount that is not unduly burdensome and ordering that [Plaintiff] is not obligated to respond the Defendant's third and fourth set of requests for admissions, fourth set of interrogatories, and fifth set of requests for production because they were not timely served." Dkt. 105. On June 22, 2009, Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Compel Further Deposition of Defendant Mark Ferguson. Dkt. 98. Oral argument on the motions was requested. Dkts. 89, 90, 101, and 104. On July 6, 2009, attorney Robert J. Siegel filed a Notice of Appearance for Defendant. Dkt. 115. Oral argument on all these motions was originally set for July 29, 2009. Parties reported to the Court that they have resolved the Motion to Compel Further Deposition of
ORDER Page - 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Mark Ferguson (Dkt. 98) and some issues in the other motions. Dkts. 120 and 121. Accordingly, the Motion to Compel Further Deposition of Defendant Mark Ferguson (Dkt. 98) IS STRICKEN. Upon review of the file ORAL ARGUMENT still appears appropriate on the remaining motions and SHALL BE SET FOR Wednesday, August 5, 2009 at 9:30 A.M. The Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery for Requests for Production, Set Two (Dkt. 89), Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery for Interrogatories and Request for Production, Set Three and Request for Production, Set Four (Dkt. 90) and Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 105) are RENOTED for August 5, 2009. Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2009. The foregoing Minute Order authorized by THE HONORABLE ROBERT J. BRYAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER Page - 2