Kimbrough v. Waddington et al
Filing
81
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 79 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff @ Tacoma address . Modified on 4/12/2011 (JL).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
11
ANDREW B. KIMBROUGH,,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
CASE NO. C08-5602 RJB
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
v.
DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, DON
GRIFFITH, EDWARD DOMINIC, DR.
KENNETH R. SEBBY, DR. R.
BEDNARCZYK, REGISTERED NURSE
SNYDER, VICKY MARTIN, and PA
CROSSGROVE,,
Defendant.
18
The Magistrate Judge recommends that this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action be
19
dismissed as to Defendants Vicky Martin, PA Crossgrove, and Registered Nurse Snyder, without
20
prejudice because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute his claims against these parties. Dkt. 79. As
21
detailed in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order
22
that he provide service addresses for the unserved defendants. Id. Plaintiff has not filed an
23
objection to the Report and Recommendation.
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION- 1
1
The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen
2 L. Strombom, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:
3
(1)
The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
4
(2)
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Vicky Martin, PA Crossgrove, and
Registered Nurse Snyder are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to
prosecute;
(3)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for any
Defendants who have appeared, and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.
5
6
7
8
Dated this 12th day of April, 2011.
A
9
10
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?