Kimbrough v. Waddington et al

Filing 81

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 79 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff @ Tacoma address . Modified on 4/12/2011 (JL).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 ANDREW B. KIMBROUGH,, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 CASE NO. C08-5602 RJB ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, DON GRIFFITH, EDWARD DOMINIC, DR. KENNETH R. SEBBY, DR. R. BEDNARCZYK, REGISTERED NURSE SNYDER, VICKY MARTIN, and PA CROSSGROVE,, Defendant. 18 The Magistrate Judge recommends that this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action be 19 dismissed as to Defendants Vicky Martin, PA Crossgrove, and Registered Nurse Snyder, without 20 prejudice because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute his claims against these parties. Dkt. 79. As 21 detailed in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order 22 that he provide service addresses for the unserved defendants. Id. Plaintiff has not filed an 23 objection to the Report and Recommendation. 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION- 1 1 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen 2 L. Strombom, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER: 3 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; 4 (2) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Vicky Martin, PA Crossgrove, and Registered Nurse Snyder are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute; (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for any Defendants who have appeared, and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom. 5 6 7 8 Dated this 12th day of April, 2011. A 9 10 ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?