Flores v. Morgen et al

Filing 67

ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by US Marshal; sent 8/24/09 to US Marshals office for service on Defendants;by Judge Karen L Strombom. (JLP)(copy of Order and General Order mailed to plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE - 1 naming Doe Smith, Kimberly Dotson, Doe Able, Rusty Smith, Maggie Miller-Stout, G. Burke, Doe Hewston and Jan Morgen. Dkt. 64. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall effect service of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint as follows: This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. On October 27, 2008, Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his Complaint was docketed. Dkts. 4 and 5, respectively. On June 26, 2009, Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint. Dkt. 62. On July 24, 2009, Plaintiff filed a proposed First Amended Complaint, JOSEPH R. FLORES, No. C08-5621 RJB/KLS Plaintiff, v. JAN MORGEN, et al., Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY U.S. MARSHAL OF AMENDED COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (l) Service by United States Marshal The United States Marshal shall send the following to each named Defendant for whom there is a filled out service form by first class mail: a copy of the Amended Complaint and of this Order, two copies of the Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, a Waiver of Service of Summons, and a return envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the Clerk's Office. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service and shall send a courtesy copy of the Complaint to the Washington State Attorney General's Office. (2) Response Required Defendants shall have thirty (30) days within which to return the enclosed Waiver of Service of Summons. Each defendant who timely returns the signed Waiver shall have sixty (60) days after the date designated on the Notice of Lawsuit to file and serve an answer or a motion directed to the complaint, as permitted by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any defendant who fails to timely return the signed Waiver will be personally served with a summons and complaint, and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2). A defendant who has been personally served shall file an answer or motion permitted under Rule 12 within thirty (30) days after service. (3) Filing and Service by Parties, Generally All original documents and papers submitted for consideration by the court in this case, are to be filed with the Clerk of this court. The originals of all such papers shall indicate in the upper right-hand corner the name of the Magistrate Judge to whom the copies are to be delivered. The papers shall be accompanied by proof that such documents have been served ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE - 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 upon counsel for the opposing party (or upon any party acting pro se). The proof shall show the day and manner of service and may be written acknowledgment of service, by certificate of a member of the bar of this court, or by affidavit of the person who served the papers. (4) Motions Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. The motion shall include in its caption (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the Friday upon which the motion is to be noted upon the court's calendar. That date shall be the third Friday following filing of the motion (fourth Friday for Motions for Summary Judgment). All briefs and affidavits in opposition to any motion shall be filed and served not later than 4:30 p.m. on the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the motion. If a party fails to file and serve timely opposition to a motion, the court may deem any opposition to be without merit. The party making the motion may file, not later than 4:30 p.m. on the Friday designated for consideration of the motion, a response to the opposing party's briefs and affidavits. (5) Motions for Summary Judgment If one of the parties files a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56, the opposing party should acquaint him/herself with Rule 56. Rule 56 requires a nonmoving party to submit affidavits or other evidence in opposition to a motion for summary judgment if the moving party has shown the absence of issues of material fact and an entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. A nonmoving party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of prior pleadings. Rather, successful opposition to a motion for summary judgment requires the nonmoving party to set forth, through affidavits or other evidence, specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial. Failure by the nonmoving party to oppose a summary ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE - 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 judgment motion or to present counter evidence could result in the court accepting the moving party's evidence as the truth, and entering final judgment in favor of the moving party without a full trial. Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520 (9th Cir. 1997). (6) Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. (7) Clerk's Action The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order and of the General Order issued by the Magistrate Judges to Plaintiff. DATED this 19th day of August, 2009. A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?