Masse v. Glebe et al

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 3 IFP Deficiency Letter Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2009, by Judge Karen L Strombom. (JLP)(Copy mailed to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. This matter comes before the Court on the filing of Plaintiff Toby J. Masse's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. # 1. Plaintiff is currently detained at the Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla, Washington. To file a complaint and initial legal proceedings, a plaintiff must file a filing fee of $350.00 or file a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis. A court may permit indigent litigants to proceed in forma pauperis upon completion of a proper affidavit of indigency. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, a court has broad discretion in denying an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Weller v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 845 (1963). Several district courts have ruled that denial of in forma pauperis status is not unreasonable when a prisoner is able to pay the initial expenses required to commence a lawsuit. See Temple v. Ellerthorpe, 586 F.Supp. 848 (D.R.I. 1984); Braden v. Estelle, 428 F.Supp. 595 (S.D.Tex. v. PAT GLEBE, et al. Defendants. TOBY J. MASSE, Plaintiff, Case No. C08-5752 RBL/KLS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ORDER Page - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1977); U.S. ex rel. Irons v. Com. of Pa., 407 F.Supp. 746 (M.D.Pa. 1976); Shimabuku v. Britton, 357 F.Supp. 825 (D.Kan. 1973), aff'd, 503 F.2d 38 (10th Cir. 1974); Ward v. Werner, 61 F.R.D. 639 (M.D.Pa. 1974). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2): A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding without prepayment of fees or security therefor . . . shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined. In addition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), a prisoner seeking to proceed in forma pauperis is required to submit a written acknowledgment and authorization form, authorizing the agency having custody over him to collect from his prison trust account an initial partial filing fee and subsequent monthly payments until the full filing fee is paid. Mr. Masse did not submit the acknowledgment and authorization form approved for use by this court. By letter dated January 7, 2009, the Court Clerk advised Mr. Masse that he was required to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 or that he must provide the Court with a completed in forma pauperis application, and that he should do so by February 6, 2009 or this action could be dismissed. Dkt. # 2. Mr. Masse has not paid the filing fee or submitted a completed application. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff shall submit a completed in forma pauperis application, which shall include a copy of his prison trust account statement showing the balance and activity of his account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his petition and a written acknowledgement and authorization form, to the Clerk on or before April 17, 2009. Alternatively, Plaintiff shall pay the full $350.00 filing fee required to proceed with this action on or before April 17, 2009. Failure to cure these deficiencies by the above date shall be deemed a failure to properly prosecute this matter and the Court will recommend dismissal of this matter. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. DATED this 18th day of March, 2009. (2) (3) A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge ORDER Page - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?