Nation v. Astrue

Filing 21

SECOND ORDER DIRECTING COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL RULE 2(g)(4)(A) re 18 Motion to withdraw as counsel by Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter is once again before the Court on Counsel's failure to comply with the Court's order dated October 23, 2009. In that order, Mr. Comstock was directed to show compliance with General Rule 2(g)(4)(A). He was instructed to properly note the motion to withdraw pursuant to Local Rule CR 7(d)(2), certify that the motion was served on his client and to provide the most recent address for his client. Mr. Comstock is directed to comply with this order on or before November 20, 2009. Counsel for the Plaintiff has failed to comply with any aspect of the Court's Order. Inasmuch as he is still counsel of record for the Plaintiff, he is hereby directed to appear, in person, before the undersigned on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. to explain to the Court why he failed to comply with the October 23, 2009 order of this Court. Failure to appear may result in this Court issuing an order finding Mr. Comstock to be in contempt of court. Or, Mr. Comstock may comply with the October 23, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. v. PATRICIA L. NATION, Plaintiff, No. C 09-5190 KLS SECOND ORDER DIRECTING COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL RULE 2(g)(4)(A) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Second Order Directing Compliance Page - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2009 order by following its directives and accomplishing the same on or before Monday, December 14, 2009. Should Mr. Comstock comply with the Court order by that date, he need not appear before the undersigned on December 15, 2009. DATED this 30th day of November, 2009. A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge Second Order Directing Compliance Page - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?