Bailon et al v. Seok AM #1 Corp et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting 28 Stipulated Motion re 30 Exhibit, 29 Stipulated MOTION SCHMITT DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATED MOTION RE DISMISSAL Defendant Seok AM#1 dismissed with prejudice. Court retains jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreement but otherwise will be administratively closed, by Judge J Richard Creatura.(SC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 // // ORDER - 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ANTONIO BAILON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEOK AM#1 CORP, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. C09-05483JRC ORDER DISMISSING SEOK AM#1 WITH PREJUDICE AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE FILE THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the parties' agreed motion to dismiss and the Court having duly considered the materials presented by the parties, including the Stipulated Motion re: Dismissal (Dkt.#28), the Stipulated Motion Schmitt Declaration in Support of Stipulated Motion Re Dismissal (Dkt#29), and Exhibit A attached thereto (Dkt#30), hereby orders as follows: 1. The action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Seok AM#1 Corporation d/b/a Wok Teriyaki II. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement as to the remaining defendants, if such enforcement becomes necessary, but otherwise orders the Clerk to administratively close the file. Dated this 12th day of August, 2010. A J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?