Thompson v. Stafford Creek Corrections Center et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H Settle re 21 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Kirk Alan Thompson. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ­ 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA KIRK ALAN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. STAFFORD CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER, et al., Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States District Magistrate Judge, dated May 20, 2010 (Dkt. 20), and Plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation, dated June 1, 2010 (Dkt. 21). The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's objections, Defendants' response, and the remaining record, and hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation for the reasons stated herein. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this action for unauthorized deprivation of personal property be dismissed because the state provides an adequate post-deprivation remedy. When a state provides an adequate post-deprivation remedy for an unauthorized taking of property, there is no cause of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984). CASE NO. C09-5502BHS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff's objection lacks merit, as the claim for relief pursuant to a criminal statute is not cognizable. See Rockefeller v. U.S. Court of Appeals Office for Tenth Circuit Judges, 248 F. Supp. 2d 17, 23 (D.D.C. 2003). Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) (2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; and Defendant Crain's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 15) is GRANTED. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (g), as it is for failure to state a claim. DATED this 25th day of June, 2010. A BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge ORDER ­ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?