Family Pac v. Reed et al

Filing 99

ORDER granting 97 Motion to Amend Judgment, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Joint Motion to Amend Judgment (No. 3:09-cv-05662-RBL) 1 PRESENTED BY: BOPP, COLESON & BOSTROM 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, Indiana 47807-3510 (812) 232-2434 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION Family PAC, vs. Plaintiff, No. 3:09-cv-05662-RBL Order Amending Judgment Issued on September 1, 2010 The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton Rob McKenna, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Washington, and Jim Clements, David Seabrook, Jane Noland, Jennifer Joly, and Barry Sehlin, members of the Public Disclosure Commission, in their official capacities, Defendants. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered the parties' Joint Motion to Amend Judgment, the Court being fully advised, and good cause shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Amend Judgment is GRANTED and the Judgment is amended to read as follows: Pursuant to Rules 58(a) and 58(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk shall enter an amended judgment stating that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the unconstitutionality of RCW § 42.17.105(8) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the unconstitutionality of RCW § 42.17.090 and WAC 390-16-034 is DENIED. Plaintiff's claims regarding RCW § 42.17.090 and WAC 390-16-034 are dismissed with prejudice. Dated this 30th day of September, 2010. A RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Order Granting Joint Motion to Amend Judgment (No. 3:09-cv-05662-RBL) 2 PRESENTED BY: BOPP, COLESON & BOSTROM 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, Indiana 47807-3510 (812) 232-2434

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?