Seaburg v. Mabus

Filing 12

ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle DENYING 10 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 11 Motion for Default.(TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA LARRY SEABURG, Plaintiff, v. RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Larry Seaburg's ("Seaburg") motions for default judgment. Dkts. 10 & 11. The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of the motions and the remainder of the file and hereby denies the motions for the reasons stated herein. On March 10, 2010, Seaburg filed a complaint in the above-captioned action. Dkt. 6. On September 10, 2010, Seaburg filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy ("Secretary Mabus"). Dkt. 10. On September 24, 2010, Seaburg filed a second motion for default judgment. Dkt. 11. Both motions seek this relief because Secretary Mabus has failed to file an answer. See Dkts. 10 & 11. On July 8, 2010, Seaburg filed a certificate of service showing that Secretary Mabus was sent by certified mail a copy of the summons and complaint which was stamped as received on June 25, 2010. Dkt. 8. Seaburg appears to be suing Secretary Mabus in his official capacity as an officer of the United States. See Dkt. 6. Although sending copies of the summons and complaint by certified mail to Secretary Mabus CASE NO. C10-5043BHS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 appears to be proper (See Rule 4(i)(2)), Seaburg must also serve the United States with proper service of process under Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in order to complete service of the complaint in this action. Accordingly, Seaburg's motions for default judgment are not ripe as he has not completed service of process on Secretary Mabus in this action. The Court notes that in order for Seaburg to file a proper motion for default judgment, he must first file a motion for entry of default by the clerk of court. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Seaburg's motions for default judgment (Dkts. 10 & 11) are DENIED. DATED this 1st day of October, 2010. A BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?