Ness et al v. Law Enforcement Support Agency et al
Filing
52
ORDER re Plaintiff's Deposition: a reasonable solution to this stand off is that the deposition be scheduled for two days starting at 1:00 p.m. each date, with the total deposition time not to exceed seven hours. That is the Court's ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
SHARON NESS, individually,
11
Plaintiff,
13
14
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
DEPOSITION
v.
12
CASE NO. C10-5111 KLS
LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT
AGENCY (LESA); PIERCE COUNTY;
CITY OF TACOMA; et al,
Defendants.
15
16
17
The Defendants scheduled the discovery deposition of the Plaintiff for July 27, 2012.
rd
18 The undersigned was attending a conference the week of July 23 and therefore unable to rule on
19 the Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order as it pertained to her discovery deposition. ECF No.
20 40. Upon reviewing the pleadings, the Court notes that the Defendants agreed not to conduct the
21 deposition on the scheduled date if there was no ruling from this Court regarding the Plaintiff’s
22 motion.
23
First, the Defendant notes that the Plaintiff failed to file a certification required under
24 Local Rule CR 26(c)(2) regarding a meet and confer. The chain of email provided to the Court
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
DEPOSITION- 1
1 shows the parties were discussing the issue and, therefore, for purposes of this motion only, the
2 Court will infer a conference of the parties. The undersigned will make no such further
3 inferences regarding discovery in this case.
4
The issue regarding the deposition is whether the Plaintiff’s deposition should start at
5 9:00, which the plaintiff opposes, or whether it should start at 1:00 but then continue for 7 hours
6 into the evening, which the defendants oppose.
7
A reasonable solution to this stand off is that the deposition be scheduled for two days
8 starting at 1:00 p.m. each date, with the total deposition time not to exceed seven hours. That is
9 the Court’s ruling.
10
Dated this 3rd day of August, 2012.
11
A
12
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
DEPOSITION- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?