Malik v. Pacholke et al

Filing 24

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANTS re 21 MOTION for return of overpaid filing fee filed by David W Riggins. Defendants are directed to file a response to Plaintiff's motion on or before August 30, 2010; plaintiff may file a reply to Defendant's response on or before September 3, 2010. The Plaintiff's motion will be re-noted (Dkt. 21) for September 3, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (MET) cc: Plaintiff

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 1 (2) According, it is ORDERED: (1) Defendants are directed to file a response to Plaintiff's motion on or before August 30, 2010; Plaintiff may file a reply to Defendants' response on or before September 3, 2010. The Clerk shall strike the noting date of July 30, 2010 for Plaintiff's motion and re-note the motion (Dkt. 21) for September 3, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA DAVID W. RIGGINS, a/k/a DAWUD HALISI MALIK, No. C10-5147 BHS/KLS Plaintiff, v. DAN PACHOLKE, TAMMY GWIN, C. WHALEY, V. JOHANSEN, STEVE RAMSEY, GREGA JOINES, and JOHN SCOTT, Defendants. Before the court is Plaintiff's "Letter/Motion for Return of Overpaid Filing Fee." Dkt. 21. Plaintiff asserts that although he paid the full $350.00 filing fee for filing his complaint in this case, the Department of Corrections has improperly deducted his inmate account in the amount of $40.00 toward payment of the fee. Id. ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANTS DATED this 16th day of August, 2010. A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?