Malik v. Pacholke et al

Filing 3

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE on the 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David W Riggins. Show Cause Response due by 5/7/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 1 any recovery under local rule CR3(b). Dkt. 2. Plaintiff was directed to provide the written consent on or before April 5, 2010. Id. He has failed to do so. As Plaintiff was previously advised, Local Rule CR 3(b) provides that he must: (2) File a written consent that the recovery, if any, in the action, to such amount as the court may direct, shall be paid to the clerk who may pay therefrom all unpaid fees and costs taxed against the plaintiff, and to his attorney the amount which the court allows or approves as compensation for the attorney's services. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: v. WARDEN NWDC, et al., Defendants. On March 4, 2010, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 1. On March 4, 2010, the Clerk of Court advised Plaintiff that his application was deficient because he failed to provide the court with a signed written consent for payment of costs from UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA DAVID W. RIGGINS, a/k/a DAWUD HALISI MALIK, Plaintiff, No. C10-5147 FDB/KLS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (1) Plaintiff must submit a signed written consent required by Local Rule CR3(b) on or before May 7, 2010. Failure to do so by May 7, 2010 shall be deemed a failure to properly prosecute this matter and the court will recommend dismissal of this matter. (2) The Clerk is directed to send a consent form and a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. DATED this 14th day of April, 2010. A Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?