Malik v. Pacholke et al
Filing
75
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H Settle re 72 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by David Washington Riggins. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
8
DAVID W. RIGGINS a/k/a DAWUD
HALISI MALIK,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
Case No. C10-5147BHS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
11
DAN PACHOLKE, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of
15
the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 71) and Plaintiff’s
16
objections to the R&R (Dkt. 72).
17
On May 23, 2011, Judge Strombom issued the R&R finding that Plaintiff had failed
18
to show that he suffered the deprivation of a constitutional right and recommending that
19
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. Dkt. 71. On June 3, 2011, Plaintiff
20
filed objections. Dkt. 72. On June 14, 2011, Defendants responded. Dkt. 73. On June 21,
21
2011, Plaintiff filed another response. Dkt. 74.
22
Although Plaintiff objects to the R&R, he fails to show that he suffered the
23
deprivation of a constitutional right. The Court recognizes that Plaintiff was successful in
24
overturning and eventually seeking dismissal of the alleged prison infraction against him.
25
Plaintiff, however, fails to show that the increased level of confinement that he was
26
subjected to during that process violated any protected constitutional right. The objections,
27
therefore, are without merit.
28
ORDER – 1
1
2
The Court having considered the R&R, Plaintiff’s objections, and the remaining
record, does hereby find and order as follows:
3
(1)
The R&R is ADOPTED;
4
(2)
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and
5
(3)
This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
6
DATED this 5th day of July, 2011.
7
8
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A
ORDER – 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?