Dobson et al v. Vail et al
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 60 various motions as more fully set forth in this order. This matter is re-referred to Hon. Karen L. Strombom for further handling. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 7/30/2010 (DN). Copies of this Order were mailed to Hicks, Whiteman, Dobson, Reynoso, Hotrum, and Stratton by regular mail.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 6) 5) 4) 1) 2) 3) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs' Request for Stay and Discovery (Dkt. 9) is DENIED. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 4) for failure to exhaust as to Plaintiffs Dobson, Hicks, Hotrum and Reynoso is GRANTED and the claims of these Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 4) as to all claims for damages under RLUIPA and all class action claims is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' motions to expedite hearing (Dkt. 10) and request for telephonic hearing (Dkt. 11) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Objection [Dkt. #56] to the Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Reward [Dkt. #40] is DENIED. v. ELDON VAIL, et al., Defendants. The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #60], and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JUSTIN DOBSON, et al., No. C10-5233 RBL/KLS Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
7) 8)
This matter is re-referred to the Honorable Karen L. Strombom for further proceedings. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendant and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.
DATED this 30th day of July, 2010.
A
RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?