Collins v. Washington State Labor & Industries et al

Filing 5

ORDER denying 4 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 5/27/2010 (DN). A copy of this Order was mailed to plaintiff by regular mail.

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendant. MICHAEL J. COLLINS, Plaintiff, HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Case No. C10-5247RBL ORDER THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. #4]. Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows: Although plaintiff cites to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(iv), Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a), this motion is more appropriately considered as a motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Under CR 7(h), Local Rules W.D. Wash., motions for reconsideration are disfavored and will ordinarily not be considered unless the movant shows manifest error or shows new facts or legal authority that could not have been presented earlier with reasonable diligence. That standard has not been met here. The Court had before it all the information plaintiff presented and the ruling was not in error. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. #4] is DENIED. The Court will accept no further filings other than a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in this closed case. IT IS SO ORDERED. ORDER Page - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se. Dated this 27th day of May, 2010. A RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER Page - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?