Snyder v. State of Washington et al

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; Re States' 27 Motion for Summary Judgment, pltf's claims against State defts are DISMISSED with Prejudice by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TF) cc: B Snyder

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE _______________________________________ ) BRIAN N. SNYDER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________)

Cause No. C10-5286RSL ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on "Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment." Dkt. # 27. Plaintiff has not opposed defendants' request for judgment, and the Court considers such a failure to be "an admission that the motion has merit." Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The motion of defendants State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources, Peter Goldmark, Melissa Montgomery, Washington State Attorney General's Office, Joseph Panesko, Terence A. Pruit, Robert M. McKenna, Russell W. Hartman, Robert C. Krabill, and Craddock D. Verser is therefore GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against the State defendants are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Dated this 5th day of October, 2010.

A Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge