Buck v. Astrue

Filing 28

ORDER re 27 Stipulation filed by Gavin Lee Buck on EAJA Attorney's Fees and Costs signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (MET)

Download PDF
1 THE HONORABLE KAREN L. STROMBOM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 5 6 7 GAVIN LEE BUCK, NO. C10-05519-KLS 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 11 v. ORDER RE AWARD OF EAJA ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 12 Defendant. 13 14 ORDER 15 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby 16 Ordered that the plaintiff shall have a judgement against the defendant for attorney’s fees and 17 expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, et. seq. in the amount of 18 $7,194.96 for attorney’s fees, $75.00 for paralegal fees, and costs in the sum of $17.80 for service of the 19 summons and complaint in this matter, for a total award of $7,287.76. It is further 20 Ordered that EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets allowed under the Treasury 21 22 Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, __ U.S. __ (2010). Dated this 18th day of August, 2011. 23 A 24 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 LAW OFFICE OF TALBOT & ASSOCIATES, P.S. 5005 CENTER STREET, STE.. E. TACOMA, WASHINGTON, 98409 FAX (253) 564-9300 PHONE (253) 566-9300 ORDER RE AWARD OF EAJA ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS - 1 1 Presented by: Approved for entry: /s/ Charles W. Talbot Charles W. Talbot, WSBA #7448 Attorney for Plaintiff Approved by Brett E/ Eckelberg by email on August 17, 2011. Brett E. Eceklberg WSBA # 42479 Attorney for Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LAW OFFICE OF TALBOT & ASSOCIATES, P.S. 5005 CENTER STREET, STE.. E. TACOMA, WASHINGTON, 98409 FAX (253) 564-9300 PHONE (253) 566-9300 ORDER RE AWARD OF EAJA ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?