Buck v. Astrue
Filing
28
ORDER re 27 Stipulation filed by Gavin Lee Buck on EAJA Attorney's Fees and Costs signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (MET)
1
THE HONORABLE KAREN L. STROMBOM
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
5
6
7
GAVIN LEE BUCK,
NO. C10-05519-KLS
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
v.
ORDER RE AWARD OF EAJA
ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security Administration,
12
Defendant.
13
14
ORDER
15
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby
16
Ordered that the plaintiff shall have a judgement against the defendant for attorney’s fees and
17
expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, et. seq. in the amount of
18
$7,194.96 for attorney’s fees, $75.00 for paralegal fees, and costs in the sum of $17.80 for service of the
19
summons and complaint in this matter, for a total award of $7,287.76. It is further
20
Ordered that EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets allowed under the Treasury
21
22
Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, __ U.S. __ (2010).
Dated this 18th day of August, 2011.
23
A
24
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
LAW OFFICE OF
TALBOT & ASSOCIATES, P.S.
5005 CENTER STREET, STE.. E.
TACOMA, WASHINGTON, 98409
FAX (253) 564-9300
PHONE (253) 566-9300
ORDER RE AWARD OF EAJA
ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS - 1
1
Presented by:
Approved for entry:
/s/ Charles W. Talbot
Charles W. Talbot, WSBA #7448
Attorney for Plaintiff
Approved by Brett E/ Eckelberg by email on August 17,
2011.
Brett E. Eceklberg WSBA # 42479
Attorney for Defendant
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
LAW OFFICE OF
TALBOT & ASSOCIATES, P.S.
5005 CENTER STREET, STE.. E.
TACOMA, WASHINGTON, 98409
FAX (253) 564-9300
PHONE (253) 566-9300
ORDER RE AWARD OF EAJA
ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?