Turay v. DSHS et al

Filing 8

ORDER denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and(B) and Local Magistrate Judges' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. The matter is before the court on plaintiff's proposed motion for appointment of counsel (DKT # 1) and plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (DKT #6). There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Although the court can request counsel to represent a party, 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e) (1), the court ORDER - 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA RICHARD G. TURAY, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL HEALTH SERVICES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. C10-5533RJB/JRC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 may do so only in exceptional circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984); Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980). A finding of exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331. Plaintiff has demonstrated an adequate ability to articulate his claims pro se. Contrary to his assertions, the case is not complex and involves the single issue of whether Mr. Turay should be allowed to wear dark sun glasses for an alleged medical condition. Plaintiff has not made an argument regarding the likelihood of success on the merits. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED DATED this 23rd day of August, 2010. A J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?