Swift Transportation et al

Filing 102

ORDER DENYING re 93 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, signed by Judge Benjamin H Settle. (DN)

1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

7
8

CHRISTIAN DOSCHER,

CASE NO. C10-5545RBL

9
Plaintiff,

ORDER

10
v.
11
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION,
12
Defendant.
13
14

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to

15 Appeal In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. #93]. Plaintiff is appealing the Order granting the Defendant’s
16 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint. His Notice of Appeal was
17 filed after the Order was entered but prior to the entry of Judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(2).
18

Plaintiff’s appeal lacks an arguable basis in law or fact and is thus frivolous. See Order,

19 Dkt. #91. Plaintiff’s Motion to Appeal In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. #93] is DENIED. Fed. R. App.
20 P. 24(a)(2).
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
ORDER- 1

1

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any

2 party appearing pro se.
3

Dated this 12th day of April, 2011.

4

A

5
6
7

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

8

For Ronald B. Leighton

United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER- 2