Stockhold v. Miller-Stout

Filing 41

ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE STATUS REPORT with the Court re: the status of his state court proceedings on or before March 15, 2013, signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (GMR- cc: petitioner)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 JAMES BENEDICT STOCKHOLD, 6 Petitioner, 7 8 NO. C10-5595 RBL/KLS SCOTT FRAKES, 9 10 11 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE STATUS REPORT v. Respondent. By Order dated November 8, 2010, this habeas proceeding was stayed pending resolution of Petitioner James Benedict Stockhold’s state court proceedings. ECF No. 29. 12 Petitioner was ordered to file his amended habeas petition within thirty (30) days of receiving a 13 14 15 final state court ruling. Id. On December 13, 2012, Respondent provided the Court with a status report. ECF No. 16 40. The state court dockets provided by Respondent indicate that Mr. Stockhold’s personal 17 restraint petition was dismissed by the Washington Court of Appeals on June 18, 2012. Id., 18 ECF No. 40-1, p. 2 (Case No. 41942-4-II). Mr. Stockhold filed a motion for extension of time 19 to file a motion for discretionary review and the Washington Supreme Court denied the motion 20 21 22 and set a deadline of December 28, 2012 for the filing of a motion for extension of time to file a late motion to modify that ruling. Id., ECF No. 40-1, p. 9 (Case No. 876461). 23 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 24 (1) 25 Mr. Stockhold shall provide the Court with a report regarding the status of his state court proceedings on or before March 15, 2013. 26 ORDER 1 1 2 (2) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Petitioner and counsel for Respondent. 3 4 DATED this 27th day of February, 2013. A 5 6 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?