Crocenzi et al v. Techtronics Industries, Inc. d/b/a Homelite Consumer Products, Inc.

Filing 40

ORDER denying 32 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Summary Judgment. Denying 23 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. Granting 26 Homelite/TTINA's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' claims against Homelite/TTINA are dismissed with prejudice. Homelite Consumer Products, Inc. has been termed. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 RICHARD CROCENZI, CASE NO. C10-5890 RBL 9 Plaintiff, ORDER 10 v. 11 12 HOMELITE CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant Homelite 15 Consumer Products, Inc. to Produce Discovery [Dkt. #23], Defendant Homelite Consumer 16 Products, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Techtronic Industries North America, Inc.’s 17 Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #26], 18 and Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Premature Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 19 #32]. 20 The Court has reviewed the papers for and against the motions. Oral argument is not 21 necessary to resolve the issues in these motions. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion to 22 Compel Production of Discovery [Dkt. #23] and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant’s 23 24 ORDER - 1 1 Premature Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #32] are DENIED. Defendant Homelite 2 Consumer Products, Inc.’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #26] is GRANTED. 3 I. BACKGROUND 4 Plaintiff Richard Crocenzi purchased a leaf blower manufactured by the “Homelite 5 Division” of John Deere Consumer Products, Inc. prior to 2001. In November 2001, Techtronic 6 Industries, Ltd. (“TTI”) purchased the Homelite brand name and certain assets of John Deere’s 7 Homelite Division. Today, that division is held by another wholly owned subsidiary of TTI Ltd. 8 known as Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. (“TTINA”), formed in 2003. In 2010, 9 plaintiff Crocenzi was allegedly injured by the subject leased blower. 10 Under the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) a manufacturer may be liable for a 11 product’s defects if it is a company that manufactured the subject product. See RCW § 7.72.010, 12 § 7.72.040. Neither TTINA nor its subsidiary, Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., manufactured 13 or sold the leaf blower that is the subject of this case. Indeed, neither entity even existed when 14 the subject blower was purchased. The Asset Purchase Agreement of John Deere’s Homelite 15 Division expressly states that John Deere will retain liability for product liability claims 16 stemming from products John Deere manufactured under the Homelite name. John Deere is the 17 appropriate party to answer for claims relating to the subject blower. 18 Because TTINA is not a proper party to this action, plaintiffs have no legal basis to seek 19 party discovery from TTINA (including documents irrelevant to this matter such as TTINA’s 20 insurance policies and communications with its insurance provider). If plaintiffs require 21 documents from TTINA about John Deere’s production of the subject blower in TTINA’s 22 possession, the plaintiff should request the information through a third-party subpoena. 23 24 ORDER - 2 1 Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant Homelite Consumer Products, Inc. 2 to Produce Discovery [Dkt. #23] and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant’s Premature Motion 3 for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #32] are hereby DENIED. 4 Because the manufacturer of the relevant product that gives rise to the claim is John 5 Deere, and because Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of TTINA, is 6 not the manufacturer, Defendant Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary 7 of Techtronic Industries North America, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #26] is 8 GRANTED and the claims against TTINA are dismissed with prejudice. 9 Dated this 23rd day of November, 2011. 11 A 12 RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?