Linderman v. Cedeno et al

Filing 76

ORDER granting 73 Motion for Extension of Time; the Clerk shall re-note Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment 70 for May 17, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 3 4 GARRETT LINDERMAN, 5 Plaintiff, 6 NO. C10-5897 RBL/KLS v. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RUBEN CEDENO, DEVON SCHRUM, KAREN BRUNSON, TAMARA ROWDEN, CAIN (FNU), SMITH (FNU), CARROLL RIDDLE, T. SCHNEIDER, McTARSNEY (FNU), PALMER (FNU), MOSELY (FNU), WINTERS (FNU), ASHTON (FNU), NESBITT (FNU), MOHN (FNU), MILLER (FNU), JANE/JOHN DOES, and L. SCHNEIDER, Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion seeking an extension of time to respond to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 73. Defendants do not oppose the extension. ECF No. 74. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 73) is GRANTED; Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before May 10, 2013. Defendants may file a reply on or before May 17, 2013. (2) The Clerk shall re-note Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 70) for May 17, 2013, and send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. DATED this 9th day of April, 2013. A 24 25 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 26 ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?