EGT, LLC v. Port of Longview

Filing 25

ORDER re 24 MOTION for Reconsideration re 23 Order on Motion to Intervene filed by International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 21. Plaintiff is requested to file a Response to the Motion 24 for Reconsideration no later than 6/22/11. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

8
9
10
11

EGT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company,
Plaintiff,

12

15

ORDER

v.

13
14

Case No. 11-5036-RBL

PORT OF LONGVIEW, a municipal
corporation and political subdivision of the
State of Washington,

16

Defendant.

17
18

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local

19

21's Motion for Reconsideration. [Dkt. #24]. On May 17, 2011, this Court denied the Union’s Motion to

20

Intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. [Mot. to Intervene, Dkt. #10; Order Denying

21

Mot., Dkt. #23]. The Union now asks the Court to Reconsider this Order, contending that it should be

22

able to intervene under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 (a) or (b). The Union cites U.S. v. City of Los Angeles, 288

23

F.3d 391 (9th Cir. 2002) in support of its position.

24

Under Local Rule CR 7(h), no motion for reconsideration will be granted unless the opposing

25

party has been afforded the opportunity to file a response. Plaintiff may file a Response addressing the

26

Union’s argument under Rule 24(b). The Response should not exceed five pages, and should be served

27

and filed no later than June 22, 2011.

28

ORDER
Page - 1

1

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to any

2

party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 17th day of June, 2011.

4

A

5
6

RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER
Page - 2