Davis v Astrue

Filing 24

ORDER granting 22 Motion for EAJA Attorney Fees, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)

Download PDF
1 The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 7 8 LATIF B. DAVIS, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 13 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) No. 3:11-cv-05043-RBL-JRC ) ) ) PROPOSED ORDER ) ) ) ) ) 14 15 Based upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees, Expenses, and Costs Under the Equal Access 16 to Justice Act and Plaintiff’s Contract for Attorney Representation in Federal Court, it is 17 hereby ordered that attorney’s and paralegal’s fees in the amount of $3,903.01 and expenses 18 in the amount of $27.57 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); and 19 costs in the amount of $357.50 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920; 31 U.S.C. §1304(a), shall: 20 (1) Be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, – U.S. –, 130 S. Ct. 21 2521 (2010) and delivered to Plaintiff's counsel, Robert A. Friedman; however, 22 (2) If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA 23 fees, expenses, and costs are not subject to any offset allowed under the 24 25 26 Proposed Order - 1 [No. C11-5043-RBL-JRC] ROBERT A. FRIEDMAN and ASSOCIATES 3410 Broadway Everett, Washington 98201 (425) 252-5551 FAX (425) 259-7111 1 Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees, 2 expenses, and costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Robert A. 3 Friedman, based upon Plaintiff's assignment of these amounts to him. 4 5 Dated: June 19, 2012. 6 7 A Ronald B Leighton United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Proposed Order - 2 [No. C11-5043-RBL-JRC] ROBERT A. FRIEDMAN and ASSOCIATES 3410 Broadway Everett, Washington 98201 (425) 252-5551 FAX (425) 259-7111

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?