Florer v. Kenney et al

Filing 94

ORDER granting 87 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff shall file his response on or before 10/3/11; Defendant's response is due on or before 10/7/11; and the 77 MOTION for Summary Judgment is RENOTED for 10/7/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

8
9
DENNIS FLORER,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.
No. C11-5047 RJB/KLS
KENNEY, L.L. FIGUEROA, R.
TREVINO, K. RENNINGER, D.
GRIFFITH, D. DELP, K. MOORE, J.
EDWARDS, K. KING, P. RIMA, S.
HAMMOND, KELLOGG,
HALLSTEAD, F.J. SMITH, I. HERTZ,
K. DOTSON, M. HOUSEMAN, E.
SUITER, J. RYAN, T. CRISTMAN, J.
BUCHAN, G. FLETCHER, J. LOPIN,
G. SILVER, J. SHUEY, M. ERDENER,
P. SAARI, and C. JOHNSON,

19
20

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants.
On July 19, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 77. The

21
22

motion is noted for August 12, 2011. Id. Plaintiff filed two motions for an extension to file his

23

response to the motion. The first, a motion for relief, requested an additional seven days to

24

respond due to difficulties Plaintiff encountered in obtaining copies of his briefing materials.

25

ECF No. 78. Defendants are not opposed to the requested extension. ECF No. 79. The second

26

motion seeks an extension of Plaintiff’s deadline to respond until “after the completion of
ORDER- 1

1

discovery.” ECF NO. 87. Defendants filed no response to this latter request. Between the filing

2

of his first motion for extension and his second, Plaintiff filed four motions to compel. ECF Nos.

3

80-84. Those motions are noted for September 2, 2011. Id.

4

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

5
(1)

Plaintiff’s motions for extension of time to file his response to Defendant’s

6
7

motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 78 and 87) are GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his

8

response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on or before October 3, 2011.

9

Defendant may file a response on or before October 7, 2011. The Clerk is directed to re-note

10
11
12

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 77) for October 7, 2011.
(2)

The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for

Defendants.

13
14

DATED this 2nd day of September, 2011.

A

15
16

Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER- 2