Florer v. Schrum et al

Filing 86

AMENDED ORDER 83 granting leave to amend complaint 81 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 DENNIS FLORER, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. DEVON SCHRUM, CARLA SCHETTLER, ALAN WALTER, RICH MOSS, STEVE SUNDBERG, RON KNIGHT, CHRIS BOWMAN, STEVE SINLAIRE, STEVE BARKER, ALAN KUNZ, JOHN CAMPBELL, WILL PAUL, S. SUKERT, KURT GRUBB, CANDICE GERMOAU, JULIE SMITH, SANDY DIIMMEL, AL MOSLEY, MILES LAWSON, RON FRAKER, JOHN OYEN, DREW WALTMAN, GARY PIERCE, MARK KUCZA, DON HOLLBROOK, GERMAINE BENSON, LINDA BELANGER, ELDON VAIL, LAURA WYCKOFF-MEYER, GUSTAVE MEZA, ALAN ROOKSTOOL, EDUARDO MICHEL, (FNU) DANIEL, ERIC JACKSON, and BERNIE WARNER, No. C11-5135 BHS/KLS AMENDED ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT 18 Defendants. 19 20 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. ECF No. 81. The 21 Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 44), but in its Order 22 erroneously referred to Devon Schrum as the new defendant instead of Eric Jackson. Plaintiff 23 has now provided the Court with his proposed Second Amended Complaint for filing. ECF No. 24 81-1. The Amended Complaint names Eric Jackson, adds BernieWarner as successor to 25 26 Defendant Eldon Vail, and omits Defendants Brandy Jones, Lori Scamhorn, and John Does 1-2. ORDER- 1 1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 2 (1) 3 4 Plaintiff’s motion to file a Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 81) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall docket the proposed Second Amended Complaint found at 81-1 as Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. 5 (2) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. 6 7 8 DATED this 29th day of March, 2012. A 9 10 Karen L. Strombom United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?