Hanson v. American Brokers Conduit et al
Filing
57
ORDER denying 44 Plaintiff's Motion for injunction; denying 47 Plaintiff's Motion for Permanent Injunction, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
1
HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
EDGAR L. HANSON,
CASE NO. 11-cv-5287 RBL
9
Plaintiff,
ORDER
10
v.
(Dkt. #44, 47)
11
12
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., et
al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff has commenced a third lawsuit relating to the foreclosure of his property, this
16 time in Clark County. Plaintiff had commenced two earlier suits: under this cause number, the
17 Court dismissed Plaintiff’s numerous claims. In a second suit, Hanson v. Mortgage Electronic
18
Registration Systems, Inc., No. 12-cv-5995-RBL, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the same claims.
Defendants request an injunction under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, ordering Plaintiff to
19
20
dismiss his state-court suit because it is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
The Court is sympathetic to Defendants’ position; however, their Motions are properly
21 directed to the Clark County superior court. See Samson v. NAMA Holdings, LLC., 637 F.3d
22 915, 937 n.93 (9th Cir. 2011) (noting that action under the All Writs Act should be reserved of
23
“extraordinary” causes).
24
ORDER - 1
1
Defendants’ Motions for Injunction (Dkts. #44, 47) are DENIED.
2
3
Dated this 23rd day of July, 2013.
4
5
A
6
RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?