Marshall v. Washington State Bar Association et al

Filing 39

ORDER granting 38 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages by Samuel Conti.(TD)

Download PDF
Case 3:11-cv-05319-SC Document 38-1 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 2 1 The Honorable Samuel Conti 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Bradley Marshall, Case No. CV-11-5319 SC Plaintiff, v. Washington State Bar Association, et al., Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OVERLENGTH MOTION 15 16 17 The Court has considered the WSBA Defendants’ Motion For Leave To File Over- 18 Length Motion (“Motion”), and finds that the relief requested would promote judicial economy 19 and would not prejudice any party. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Motion is 20 GRANTED. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(f), the WSBA Defendants may file an opening brief 21 of no more than 44 pages. Plaintiff’s opposition, and the WSBA Defendants’ reply, shall comply 22 with the page limits of Local Civil Rule 7(f)(4). 30th DATED this day of November, 2011 23 24 25 26 ____________________________ The Honorable Samuel Conti UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WSBA DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION - 1 CASE NO. CV-11-5319 SC LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. One Union Square 600 University Street, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101.3122 206.623.3300 Case 3:11-cv-05319-SC Document 38-1 1 Presented by: 2 Filed 11/30/11 Page 2 of 2 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3 4 5 By: s/ Douglas E. Smith Douglas E. Smith, WSBA #17319 6 Attorneys for WSBA Defendants 7 8 Firmwide:105064246.1 069181.1001 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WSBA DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION - 1 CASE NO. CV-11-5319 SC LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. One Union Square 600 University Street, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101.3122 206.623.3300

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?