Marshall v. Washington State Bar Association et al
Filing
56
ORDER denying 55 Motion for Discovery by Samuel Conti.(TD)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
5
AT SEATTLE
6
7
BRADLEY MARSHALL,
Plaintiff,
8
For the Western District of Washington
United States District Court
9
10
11
v.
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
) Case No. CV-11-5319 SC
)
) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
) MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Now before the Court is Plaintiff Bradley Marshall's
15
("Plaintiff") Motion for Discovery.
ECF No. 55 ("Motion").
The
16
Court has repeatedly stated that discovery in this matter is stayed
17
pending resolution of Defendants' motion for judgment on the
18
pleadings.
19
Minute Entry").
20
pleadings on January 30, 2012, Plaintiff has yet to file an
21
opposition, and the Court has not yet ruled on the issue.
22
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery is DENIED as
23
premature.
ECF No. 35 ("Oct. 19, 2011 Order"); 40 ("Dec. 5, 2011
Defendants filed their motion for judgment on the
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: February 8, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?