Marshall v. Washington State Bar Association et al

Filing 56

ORDER denying 55 Motion for Discovery by Samuel Conti.(TD)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

5

AT SEATTLE

6
7

BRADLEY MARSHALL,
Plaintiff,

8

For the Western District of Washington

United States District Court

9
10
11

v.
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION,
et al.,
Defendants.

12
13
14

) Case No. CV-11-5319 SC
)
) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
) MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Now before the Court is Plaintiff Bradley Marshall's

15

("Plaintiff") Motion for Discovery.

ECF No. 55 ("Motion").

The

16

Court has repeatedly stated that discovery in this matter is stayed

17

pending resolution of Defendants' motion for judgment on the

18

pleadings.

19

Minute Entry").

20

pleadings on January 30, 2012, Plaintiff has yet to file an

21

opposition, and the Court has not yet ruled on the issue.

22

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery is DENIED as

23

premature.

ECF No. 35 ("Oct. 19, 2011 Order"); 40 ("Dec. 5, 2011
Defendants filed their motion for judgment on the

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: February 8, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE