Lucas et al v. Camacho et al

Filing 36

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Aric S. Bomsztyk terminated. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (cc: Parkers via mail)(MGC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 9 CHASSIDY F. LUCAS, et al., Plaintiffs, 10 11 12 CASE NO. C11-5350BHS v. JOE CAMACHO, et al., ORDER Defendants. 13 14 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the law firm of Barokas Martin & Tomlinson’s motion for leave to withdraw as attorney of record for Defendants George 17 and Lori Parker (“Parkers”) (Dkt. 13). The Court has reviewed the brief filed in support 18 of the motion and the remainder of the file and hereby grants the motion for the reasons 19 stated herein. 20 On May 31, 2011, attorney Aric Bomsztyk of Barokas Martin & Tomlinson filed a 21 notice of appearance on behalf of the Parkers. Dkt. 7. On June 29, 2011, the instant 22 motion was filed seeking leave to withdraw as attorney of record for the Parkers. Dkt. 13. 23 No opposition has been filed. 24 “[N]o attorney shall withdraw an appearance in any cause, civil or criminal, except 25 by leave of court.” Local General Rule 2(g)(4). “A motion for withdrawal . . . shall 26 include a certification that the motion was served on the client and opposing counsel.” Id. 27 28 ORDER - 1 1 Barokas Martin & Tomlinson has complied with the local rule by filing a motion 2 for leave and certifying that the motion was served on the opposing party and the Parkers. 3 Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Barokas Martin & Tomlinson’s motion for 4 leave to withdraw as attorney of record for Defendants George and Lori Parker 5 (“Parkers”) (Dkt. 13) is GRANTED. 6 DATED this 27th day of July, 2011. A 7 8 9 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?