Parmer v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
Filing
38
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: Plaintiff
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
5
6
7
ANTWOINE DE’SEAN PARMER,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
No. C11-5390 RBL/KLS
v.
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, JOHN and JANE DOE,
DR. NAVARRO, and DR. CUAYCONG,
12
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL
Defendants.
13
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. ECF No. 32. The Court finds that the
14
15
16
17
motion should be denied because Plaintiff did not include a certification in his motion that he
conferred with counsel for Defendants before he filed his motion.
While a party may apply to the court for an order compelling discovery “upon reasonable
18
notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby,” the motion must also include a
19
certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or
20
party failing to make the discovery in an effort to secure the information or material without
21
22
court intervention.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(2)(B). In addition, “[a] good faith effort to confer with
23
a party or person not making a disclosure or discovery requires a face-to-face meeting or a
24
telephonic conference.” Local Rule CR 37(a)(2)(A).
25
26
The Court anticipates that the parties will confer and make a good faith effort to resolve
this discovery dispute without Court interference. If the parties cannot amicably resolve this
ORDER - 1
1
issue, Plaintiff may file a motion to compel, and shall include a certification stating that their
2
efforts were unsuccessful, and shall identify those areas of disagreement that remain unresolved.
3
The Court will not address any motion which lacks such a certification.
4
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
5
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 32) is DENIED.
(2)
The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel
6
7
8
for Defendants.
9
DATED this 7th day of June, 2012.
10
A
11
Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?