Smith v. Triveno et al

Filing 56

ORDER denying 52 Motion To Strike Defendant's Response signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: plaintiff

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

4
5
WILLIAM SMITH,
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Plaintiff,

RODULF TRIVENO, RANDY PIERCE,
CATHERINE BAUM, GARY FLETCHER,
WILLIAM ROLLINS, PATRICK GLEBE,
DAN VAN OGLE, KERRI McTARSNEY,
DENNIS DAHNE, TAMMY NIKULA,
DANO GORTON, KATHY RENINGER, and
JOSEPH LOPIN,

15
16

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO STRIKE

Defendants.

13
14

No. C11-5401 RBL/KLS

v.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s motion
for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 52. Plaintiff moves to strike the response because it
was not signed by counsel. Pursuant to Section III (L) of the Electronic Filings Procedures,

17
18

signatures on pleadings filed with this court “must have the signors’ names printed or typed on

19

the line and under all signature lines.” Defendants’ pleading filed in response to plaintiff’s

20

second motion to appoint counsel met this requirement.

21

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 52) is DENIED.

22

DATED this 8th day of December, 2011.

A

23
24

Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
ORDER - 1