Murphy v. Pierce County Jail et al

Filing 15

ORDER denying as moot, the 13 Motion for explanation of where payments are going. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

4
5
WAYNE A. MURPHY,
6

Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9
10
11

PIERCE COUNTY JAIL, CARLOS
ORTIZ VENEGAS, PIERCE COUNTY
DETENTION AND CORRECTIONS
CENTER, and HEALTH SERVICES
DIVISION,

NO. C11-5448 BHS/KLS
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AS
TO FILING FEE

Defendants.

12
13

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Explanation of Where Payments are

14

Going.” ECF No. 13. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). ECF No.

15

1. In his application, Plaintiff indicated to the Court that he is unable to afford the $350.00

16

filing fee. Id. In the Court’s Order granting Plaintiff’s IFP application, Plaintiff was advised

17

that he is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding months

18

income credited to his prison account until the full amount of the filing fee is satisfied.

19

ECF No. 6 (emphasis in original). Plaintiff is directed to refer to that Order.

20

Plaintiff’s motion for explanation (ECF NO. 13) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk

21

shall send Plaintiff a copy of this Order and a second copy of the Order granting Plaintiff’s

22

IFP application. ECF No. 6.

23

DATED this 19th day of October, 2011.

A

24
25

Karen L. Strombom
United States Magistrate Judge

26

ORDER

1