Eagle Harbor Holdings, LLC, et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 357

STIPULATION AND ORDER re Non-Waiver of Privilege Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 U N I T ED STAT ES D I ST RI CT COU RT WEST ERN D I ST RI CT OF WASH I N GT ON AT TACOM A 6 7 8 9 10 Eagl e H ar bo r H o l d i n gs, L L C, an d M ed i usT ec h , L L C, Pl ai n t i f f s, 11 12 v. 13 STIPULATION REGARDING NONWAIVER OF PRIVILEGE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) Fo r d M o t o r Co mpan y, 14 Case No . 3:11-c v -05503-BH S D ef en d an t . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 To avoid burdening the Court with a discovery dispute, the parties, through the undersigned counsel, respectfully request that the Court enter an order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) to govern the production of certain communications between Plaintiffs Eagle Harbor Holdings, LLC, MediusTech, LLC and any predecessor companies, including Medius, Inc. (collectively “ Medius” ) and any attorney, including Steve Ford. Medius will agree to provide requested discovery concerning any communications that: (a) have been or otherwise would be withheld from production or disclosure based on a claim of privilege; and (b) that transmitted, attached, referred to or discussed materials that Defendant Ford Motor Company contends reflects or contains its asserted trade secrets; or, if none exists, to deny that any such communications exist, on the condition that any applicable privilege, including the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine, are not waived over those documents or their subject matter. STIPULATION REGARDING NON-WAIVER OF SUSM AN GOD FREY L .L .P. PRIVILEGE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF 1201 T hird Avenue, Suite 3800 EVIDENCE 502(d) Seattle, WA 98101-3000 CaseNo. 3:11-cv-05503-BHS Tel: (206) 516-3880; Fax: (206) 516-3883 1 Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) states that a Federal court may order that the privilege or 2 protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation before the court, in which 3 event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other Federal or state proceeding. Fed. R. Evid. 4 502(d). In order to advance the progress of this litigation, and to eliminate the need for a 5 discovery dispute regarding this issue, the parties respectfully ask the Court to enter the attached 6 order declaring that the production of certain Medius documents will not constitute a waiver of 7 privilege. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION REGARDING NON-WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) CaseNo. 3:11-cv-05503-BHS SUSM AN GOD FREY L .L .P. 1201 T hird Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3000 Tel: (206) 516-3880; Fax: (206) 5163883 1 Dated: November 14, 2014 SUSM AN GODFREY L.L.P. 2 By: / s/ E. Lindsay Calkins Parker C. Folse III (WSBA No. 24895) Ian B. Crosby (WSBA No. 28461) Floyd G. Short (WSBA No. 21632) Genevieve V. Wallace (WSBA No. 38422) Jordan Connors (WSBA No. 41649) E. Lindsay Calkins (WSBA No. 44127) 3 4 5 6 7 13 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel: (206) 516-3861 Fax : (206) 516-3883 E-Mail: pfolse@ susmangodfrey.com icrosby@ susmangodfrey.com fshort@susmangodrey.com gwallace@ susmangodfrey.com jconnors@susmangodfrey.com lcalkins@susmangodfrey.com 14 Counsel for Plaintiffs 8 9 10 11 12 15 SAVIT T BRUCE & WILLEY LLP 16 17 Duncan E. Manville, WSBA #30304 Tel.: (206) 749-0500 Fax: (206) 749-0600 Email: dmanville@ sbwllp.com 18 19 20 WILM ER CUT LER PICKERING H ALE AND D ORR LLP Michael J. Summersgill (pro hac vice) Sarah Beigbeder Petty (pro hac vice) 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Tel.: (617) 526-6000 Fax: (617) 526-5000 Email: michael.summersgill@wilmerhale.com sarah.petty@wilmerhale.com 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 /s/ Duncan E. Manville By: STIPULATION REGARDING NON-WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) CaseNo. 3:11-cv-05503-BHS SUSM AN GOD FREY L .L .P. 1201 T hird Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3000 Tel: (206) 516-3880; Fax: (206) 516-3883 WILM ER CUT LER PICKERING H ALE AND D ORR LLP Todd C. Zubler (pro hac vice) Grant K. Rowan (pro hac vice) 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel.: (202) 663-6636 Fax: (202) 663-6363 Email: todd.zubler@wilmerhale.com grant.rowan@wilmerhale.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 BROOK S K USH M AN P.C. Frank A. Angileri (pro hac vice) John S. Le Roy (pro hac vice) 1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor Southfield, Michigan 48075 Tel.: (248) 358-4400 Fax: (248) 358-3351 Email: fangileri@brookskushman.com jleroy@brookskushman.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION REGARDING NON-WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) CaseNo. 3:11-cv-05503-BHS SUSM AN GOD FREY L .L .P. 1201 T hird Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3000 Tel: (206) 516-3880; Fax: (206) 516-3883 1 ORDER 2 It is HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d), providing 3 4 Defendant Ford Motor Company’ s requested discovery concerning any communications that: (a) 5 have been or otherwise would be withheld from production or disclosure based on a claim of 6 privilege; and (b) that transmitted, attached, referred to or discussed materials that Defendant 7 Ford Motor Company contends reflects or contains its asserted trade secrets, will not waive any 8 applicable privilege, including the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine, over those 9 10 11 12 documents or their subject matter. Likewise, any denial by Medius that any such communications exist, will not waive any applicable privilege. Dated this 19th day of November, 2014. 13 14 A 15 16 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORD ER CaseNo. 3:11-cv-05503-BHS Page1 SUSM AN GOD FREY L .L .P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3000 Tel: (206) 516-3880; Fax: (206) 516-3883

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?