Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 30

ORDER re 28 29 Plaintiff's Responses to Motions to Dismiss; these motions are considered as Motions for Reconsideration and are DENIED. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

7
8
9

ROSALIND SMITH,
Plaintiff,

10

No. CV11-5533RBL
v.

11
12

ORDER
[Dkt. #s 28 & 29]

WELLS FARGO BANK. N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Replies [Dkt. #s 28 & 29] to Motions to

15
16
17
18

Dismiss filed by Wells Fargo [Dkt. #16] and Eagle Home Mortgage [Dkt. #17]. The Replies are
untimely under the Rules, and the Court has already GRANTED the Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss. [See Orders at Dkt. #s 26 & 27].
Nevertheless, the Plaintiff is pro se. The Court has reviewed her Replies, and has

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

considered them as Motions for Reconsideration of the Court’s Orders Dismissing Plaintiff’s
claims.
Under Local Rule 7, Motions for Reconsideration are disfavored, and will ordinarily be
denied absent a showing of manifest error, or a new factual or legal basis which could not have
been raised earlier. Local Rule 7(h). This standard has not been met in this case. Plaintiff’s
replies do not undermine the arguments made by the moving parties, and Plaintiff has not and
cannot stae a claim against them.

27
28

ORDER - 1

1
2

The Court will not Reconsider its prior rulings, and this case is DISMISSED with
prejudice.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated this 26th day of October, 2011.

5

7

A

8

RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER - 2